You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – CP 2003
|
---|---|
Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2003
|
DOI | 10.1007/b13743 |
ISBNs |
978-3-54-020202-8, 978-3-54-045193-8
|
Authors |
Francesca Rossi |
Editors |
Rossi, Francesca |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,580
of 8,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,117
of 140,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#43
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.