You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
8th International Conference on Automated Deduction
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-16780-3 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-54-016780-8, 978-3-54-039861-5
|
| Authors |
Jörg H. Siekmann |
| Editors |
Siekmann, Jörg H. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 25% |
| Engineering | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,749,471
of 23,563,389 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,493
of 8,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,164
of 42,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,563,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them