You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Computational Approaches to Developing Short Cyclic Peptide Modulators of Protein–Protein Interactions
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
Computational Peptidology
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-2285-7_11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-2284-0, 978-1-4939-2285-7
|
| Authors |
Fergal J. Duffy, Marc Devocelle, Denis C. Shields, Duffy FJ, Devocelle M, Shields DC, Duffy, Fergal J., Devocelle, Marc, Shields, Denis C. |
| Editors |
Peng Zhou, Jian Huang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,324
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,117
of 361,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#166
of 997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.