You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Living in the Model: The Cognitive Ecology of Time—A Comparative Study
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 4 |
Book title |
Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology
|
Published in |
Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-37428-9_4 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-237427-2, 978-3-64-237428-9
|
Authors |
Chris Sinha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 25% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 13% |
Computer Science | 1 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2014.
All research outputs
#16,150,540
of 26,294,065 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
#31
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,449
of 409,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,294,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.