You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interactive Theorem Proving
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-14052-5 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-64-214051-8, 978-3-64-214052-5
|
| Authors |
Matt Kaufmann, Lawrence C. Paulson |
| Editors |
Kaufmann, Matt, Paulson, Lawrence C. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,487
of 8,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,455
of 164,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#44
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.