↓ Skip to main content

Genomics and Systems Biology of Mammalian Cell Culture

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 104: Modeling of Intracellular Transport and Compartmentation
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Modeling of Intracellular Transport and Compartmentation
Chapter number 104
Book title
Genomics and Systems Biology of Mammalian Cell Culture
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/10_2011_104
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-228349-9, 978-3-64-228350-5
Authors

Uwe Jandt, An-Ping Zeng, Jandt, Uwe, Zeng, An-Ping

Abstract

The complexity and internal organization of mammalian cells as well as the regulation of intracellular transport processes has increasingly moved into the focus of investigation during the past two decades. Advanced staining and microscopy techniques help to shed light onto spatial cellular compartmentation and regulation, increasing the demand for improved modeling techniques. In this chapter, we summarize recent developments in the field of quantitative simulation approaches and frameworks for the description of intracellular transport processes. Special focus is therefore laid on compartmented and spatiotemporally resolved simulation approaches. The processes considered include free and facilitated diffusion of molecules, active transport via the microtubule and actin filament network, vesicle distribution, membrane transport, cell cycle-dependent cell growth and morphology variation, and protein production. Commercially and freely available simulation packages are summarized as well as model data exchange and harmonization issues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 38%
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 38%
Engineering 6 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2012.
All research outputs
#18,303,566
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#146
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,012
of 244,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.