↓ Skip to main content

Grid Computing — GRID 2002 : Third International Workshop Baltimore, MD, USA, November 18, 2002 Proceedings

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Grid Computing — GRID 2002 : Third International Workshop Baltimore, MD, USA, November 18, 2002 Proceedings'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Framework for Peer-to-Peer Distributed Computing in a Heterogeneous, Decentralized Environment
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Grid-Based Monte Carlo Application
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A Grid Service-Based Active Thermochemical Table Framework
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 GridLab: Enabling Applications on the Grid
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Simulation of Dynamic Grid Replication Strategies in OptorSim
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Scheduling Independent Tasks with QoS Requirements in Grid Computing with Time-Varying Resource Prices
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A Theoretical Approach to Load Balancing of a Target Task in a Temporally and Spatially Heterogeneous Grid Computing Environment
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Source Code Transformations Strategies to Load-Balance Grid Applications
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 A Parallel CORBA Component Model for Numerical Code Coupling
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Meaning and Behaviour in Grid Oriented Components
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Trustless Grid Computing in ConCert
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Unified Peer-to-Peer Database Framework for Scalable Service and Resource Discovery
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Grid Resource Discovery Based on a Routing-Transferring Model
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Resource Allocation for Steerable Parallel Parameter Searches
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 An Authorization Framework for a Grid Based Component Architecture
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Supporting Secure Ad-hoc User Collaboration in Grid Environments
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 XML-Based Policy Engine Framework for Usage Policy Management in Grids
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Fine-Grain Authorization for Resource Management in the Grid Environment
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Adaptive Resource Scheduling for Network Services
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Enhanced Algorithms for Multi-site Scheduling
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Experiments with Scheduling Using Simulated Annealing in a Grid Environment
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 A Policy Service for GRID Computing
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 DYNAMO - DirectorY, Net Archiver and MOver
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 GridRM: A Resource Monitoring Architecture for the Grid
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Overview of GridRPC: A Remote Procedure Call API for Grid Computing
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Grid Computing — GRID 2002
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Using Disk Throughput Data in Predictions of End-to-End Grid Data Transfers
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Improving the Throughput of Remote Storage Access through Pipelining
Attention for Chapter 26: Grid Computing — GRID 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Grid Computing — GRID 2002
Chapter number 26
Book title
Grid Computing — GRID 2002
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, November 2002
DOI 10.1007/3-540-36133-2_26
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-000133-1, 978-3-54-036133-6
Authors

Manish Parashar, Jim Smith, Anastasios Gounaris, Paul Watson, Norman W. Paton, Alvaro A. A. Fernandes, Rizos Sakellariou, Smith, Jim, Gounaris, Anastasios, Watson, Paul, Paton, Norman W., Fernandes, Alvaro A. A., Sakellariou, Rizos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 6 29%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 76%
Energy 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,689,410
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,494
of 8,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,463
of 51,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#13
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.