↓ Skip to main content

Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Psychopharmacology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Psychopharmacology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 93 Females are more vulnerable to drug abuse than males: evidence from preclinical studies and the role of ovarian hormones.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 94 Sex differences in response to stress and expression of depressive-like behaviours in the rat.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 95 Sex Differences in the Septo-Hippocampal Cholinergic System in Rats: Behavioral Consequences
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 96 Gender Differences in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Autism and Fragile X Syndrome
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 97 Importance of the COMT Gene for Sex Differences in Brain Function and Predisposition to Psychiatric Disorders
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 99 Sex Differences Precipitating Anorexia Nervosa in Females: The Estrogen Paradox and a Novel Framework for Targeting Sex-Specific Neurocircuits and Behavior
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 100 Estrogens and Gonadal Function in Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 116 Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Psychopharmacology
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 117 Sex Differences and Hormonal Influences in Human Sensorimotor Gating: Implications for Schizophrenia
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 118 The Impact of Gender on Antidepressants
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 120 Female Rats Are Smarter than Males: Influence of Test, Oestrogen Receptor Subtypes and Glutamate
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 127 Oestradiol and Psychosis: Clinical Findings and Biological Mechanisms
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 136 Introduction to the Interaction Between Gonadal Steroids and the Central Nervous System
Attention for Chapter 93: Females are more vulnerable to drug abuse than males: evidence from preclinical studies and the role of ovarian hormones.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Females are more vulnerable to drug abuse than males: evidence from preclinical studies and the role of ovarian hormones.
Chapter number 93
Book title
Biological Basis of Sex Differences in Psychopharmacology
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/7854_2010_93
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-220005-2, 978-3-64-220006-9
Authors

Anker JJ, Carroll ME, Justin J. Anker, Marilyn E. Carroll, Anker, Justin J., Carroll, Marilyn E.

Abstract

Human and animal research indicates the presence of sex differences in drug abuse. These data suggest that females, compared to males, are more vulnerable to key phases of the addiction process that mark transitions in drug use such as initiation, drug bingeing, and relapse. Recent data indicate that the female gonadal hormone estrogen may facilitate drug abuse in women. For example, phases of the menstrual cycle when estrogen levels are high are associated with enhanced positive subjective measures following cocaine and amphetamine administration in women. Furthermore, in animal research, the administration of estrogen increases drug taking and facilitates the acquisition, escalation, and reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. Neurobiological data suggest that estrogen may facilitate drug taking by interacting with reward- and stress-related systems. This chapter discusses sex differences in and hormonal effects on drug-seeking behaviors in animal models of drug abuse. The neurobiological basis of these differences and effects are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 178 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 21%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Student > Master 11 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 41 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 35 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 14%
Psychology 24 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 61 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,378,085
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#388
of 488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,198
of 119,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.