You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterizing the Robustness of Science
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-94-007-2759-5 |
| ISBNs |
978-9-40-072758-8, 978-9-40-072759-5, 978-9-40-079643-0
|
| Authors |
Soler, Lena, Trizio, Emiliano, Nickles, Thomas, Wimsatt, William C |
| Editors |
Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles, William Wimsatt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 25% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 15 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,747
of 252,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them