You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
T-coffee: tree-based consistency objective function for alignment evaluation.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-646-7_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-645-0, 978-1-62703-646-7
|
| Authors |
Cedrik Magis, Jean-François Taly, Giovanni Bussotti, Jia-Ming Chang, Paolo Di Tommaso, Ionas Erb, José Espinosa-Carrasco, Cedric Notredame, Magis, Cedrik, Taly, Jean-François, Bussotti, Giovanni, Chang, Jia-Ming, Di Tommaso, Paolo, Erb, Ionas, Espinosa-Carrasco, José, Notredame, Cedric |
| Editors |
David J Russell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,445,779
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,923
of 13,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,877
of 199,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#31
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.