Chapter title |
Effects of Anodal High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Bilateral Sensorimotor Cortex Activation During Sequential Finger Movements: An fNIRS Study.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 44 |
Book title |
Oxygen Transport to Tissue XXXVII
|
Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3023-4_44 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3022-7, 978-1-4939-3023-4
|
Authors |
Muthalib, Makii, Besson, Pierre, Rothwell, John, Ward, Tomas, Perrey, Stephane, Makii Muthalib, Pierre Besson, John Rothwell, Tomas Ward, Stephane Perrey |
Editors |
Clare E. Elwell, Terence S. Leung, David K. Harrison |
Abstract |
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive electrical brain stimulation technique that can modulate cortical neuronal excitability and activity. This study utilized functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) neuroimaging to determine the effects of anodal high-definition (HD)-tDCS on bilateral sensorimotor cortex (SMC) activation. Before (Pre), during (Online), and after (Offline) anodal HD-tDCS (2 mA, 20 min) targeting the left SMC, eight healthy subjects performed a simple finger sequence (SFS) task with their right or left hand in an alternating blocked design (30-s rest and 30-s SFS task, repeated five times). In order to determine the level of bilateral SMC activation during the SFS task, an Oxymon MkIII fNIRS system was used to measure from the left and right SMC, changes in oxygenated (O2Hb) and deoxygenated (HHb) haemoglobin concentration values. The fNIRS data suggests a finding that compared to the Pre condition both the "Online" and "Offline" anodal HD-tDCS conditions induced a significant reduction in bilateral SMC activation (i.e., smaller decrease in HHb) for a similar motor output (i.e., SFS tap rate). These findings could be related to anodal HD-tDCS inducing a greater efficiency of neuronal transmission in the bilateral SMC to perform the same SFS task. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 65 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 17 | 26% |
Psychology | 9 | 14% |
Engineering | 7 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 32% |