You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Generation and Culture of Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Organoids from Resected Tumor Specimens
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 9 |
| Book title |
Pancreatic Cancer
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-8879-2_9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-8878-5, 978-1-4939-8879-2
|
| Authors |
Lindsey A. Baker, Hervé Tiriac, David A. Tuveson, Baker, Lindsey A., Tiriac, Hervé, Tuveson, David A. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,113,100
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,540
of 14,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,784
of 365,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#29
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.