↓ Skip to main content

Software Language Engineering

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Software Language Engineering'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Dark Knowledge and Graph Grammars in Automated Software Design
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Developing a Domain-Specific Language for Scheduling in the European Energy Sector
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Micro-Machinations
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 xMOF: Executable DSMLs Based on fUML
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Variability Support in Domain-Specific Language Development
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Software Evolution to Domain-Specific Languages
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Micropatterns in Grammars
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Safe Specification of Operator Precedence Rules
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Detecting Ambiguity in Programming Language Grammars
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 A Pretty Good Formatting Pipeline
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The State Of The Art In Language Workbenches. Conclusions From The Language Workbench Challenge
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Model-Driven Approach to Enhance Tool Interoperability Using the Theory of Models of Computation
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Whiley: A Platform for Research in Software Verification
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Method and Tool Support for Classifying Software Languages with Wikipedia
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Language Independent Task Engine for Incremental Name and Type Analysis
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 A Generic Framework for Symbolic Execution
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Circular Higher-Order Reference Attribute Grammars
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Mapping-Aware Megamodeling: Design Patterns and Laws
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Partial Instances via Subclassing
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Reifying Concurrency for Executable Metamodeling
Attention for Chapter 11: The State Of The Art In Language Workbenches. Conclusions From The Language Workbench Challenge
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The State Of The Art In Language Workbenches. Conclusions From The Language Workbench Challenge
Chapter number 11
Book title
Software Language Engineering
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-02654-1_11
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-902653-4, 978-3-31-902654-1
Authors

Sebastian Erdweg, Tijs Van Der Storm, Markus Völter, Meinte Boersma, Remi Bosman, William R Cook, Albert Gerritsen, Angelo Hulshout, Steven Kelly, Alex Loh, Gabriël D. P. Konat, Pedro J Molina, Martin Palatnik, Risto Pohjonen, Eugen Schindler, Klemens Schindler, Riccardo Solmi, Vlad A. Vergu, Eelco Visser, Kevin Van Der Vlist, Guido H. Wachsmuth, Jimi Van Der Woning, Tijs van der Storm, William R. Cook, Pedro J. Molina, Kevin van der Vlist, Jimi van der Woning, Erdweg, Sebastian, Storm, Tijs van der, Völter, Markus, Boersma, Meinte, Bosman, Remi, Cook, William R., Gerritsen, Albert, Hulshout, Angelo, Kelly, Steven, Loh, Alex, Konat, Gabriël D. P., Molina, Pedro J., Palatnik, Martin, Pohjonen, Risto, Schindler, Eugen, Schindler, Klemens, Solmi, Riccardo, Vergu, Vlad A., Visser, Eelco, Vlist, Kevin van der, Wachsmuth, Guido H., Woning, Jimi van der, van der Storm, Tijs, van der Vlist, Kevin, van der Woning, Jimi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Hungary 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 52 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 29%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 43 73%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,011,210
of 24,410,160 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,144
of 8,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,191
of 217,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#35
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,410,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.