↓ Skip to main content

Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit

Overview of attention for book
Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit
Springer International Publishing

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Brexit: Using Gender and Queer Lenses
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Toxic Masculinity: Militarism, Deal-Making and the Performance of Brexit
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A New World Order?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The Unintended Consequences of Brexit: The Case of Work-Life Balance
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Vulnerable, the Dependant and the Scrounger: Intersectional Reflections on Disability, Care, Health and Migration in the Brexit Project
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 The Potential Effects of Brexit on the Cross-Border Circulation of Private Family Law Judgments; with a Particular Focus on Questions Relating to Gender
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Who Speaks for the Zambrano Families? Multi-level Abandonment in the UK and EU
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Unaccompanied Migrant Children and the Implications of Brexit
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 The Impact of Brexit on Gender and Asylum Law in the UK
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Queering Brexit: What’s in Brexit for Sexual and Gender Minorities?
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Brexit: The Likely Impact on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Rights in the United Kingdom
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Brexit and the Work–Family Conflict: A Scottish Perspective
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Foreboding Newness: Brexit and Feminist Civil Society in Scotland
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Brexit, Gender and Northern Ireland
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Through the Looking Glass: Brexit, Defence and Security Through the Lens of Gender
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 The Likely Economic Impact of Brexit on Women: Lessons from Gender and Trade Research
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Splendid Isolation? On How a Non-member Is Affected by—And Affects—EU Gender Equality Policy
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Conclusion: Brexit, Gender Justice and the Overton Window
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
72 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit
Chapter number 10
Published by
figshare, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-03122-0
ISBNs
978-3-03-003121-3, 978-3-03-003122-0
Authors

Danisi, Carmelo, Dustin, Moira, Ferreira, Nuno

Editors

Moira Dustin, Nuno Ferreira, Susan Millns

Abstract

On 24 June 2016, many people had the feeling that they had gone to bed the night before in the United Kingdom and had woken up in Little Britain – a country prone to isolationism and protectionism, risking hurting its economic and social development for the sake of imperial nostalgia and moral panic about ‘loss of sovereignty’ and ‘mass migration’. That feeling inevitably affected many individuals who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, queer and other (LGBTIQ+). Although the possible impact of Brexit seems to have been scrutinised from most angles, there has been limited analysis of how it may affect LGBTIQ+ individuals. This contribution assesses Brexit in relation to the situation of LGBTIQ+ individuals. This is particularly timely in the light of the recent UK Supreme Court decision in Walker v Innospec Limited, where the Court relied on European Union (EU) law to hold a provision of the Equality Act 2010 unlawful for violating pension rights of same-sex couples.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Lecturer 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 45%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#726,856
of 26,564,146 outputs
Outputs from figshare
#214
of 26,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,925
of 367,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from figshare
#4
of 687 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,564,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,058 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 687 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.