↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the efficacy of metronome beeps and stepping stones to adjust gait: steps to follow!

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the efficacy of metronome beeps and stepping stones to adjust gait: steps to follow!
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00221-010-2531-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulina J. M. Bank, Melvyn Roerdink, C. E. Peper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 22%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Psychology 16 12%
Engineering 15 11%
Sports and Recreations 15 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,353,264
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,006
of 3,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,740
of 181,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.