↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the efficacy of metronome beeps and stepping stones to adjust gait: steps to follow!

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the efficacy of metronome beeps and stepping stones to adjust gait: steps to follow!
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00221-010-2531-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulina J. M. Bank, Melvyn Roerdink, C. E. Peper

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 108 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Psychology 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Engineering 12 11%
Sports and Recreations 12 11%
Other 27 24%
Unknown 17 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,636,495
of 12,219,322 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#1,277
of 2,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,274
of 332,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#37
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,219,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.