You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Subsampled Assemblies and Hybrid Nucleotide Composition/Differential Coverage Binning for Genome-Resolved Metagenomics
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 14 |
| Book title |
Microbiome Analysis
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-8728-3_14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-8726-9, 978-1-4939-8728-3
|
| Authors |
Laura A. Hug, Hug, Laura A. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2021.
All research outputs
#12,914,689
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,245
of 13,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,095
of 344,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#43
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.