↓ Skip to main content

Information and Randomness

Overview of attention for book
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Information and Randomness
Published by
Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series, January 2002
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-04978-5
ISBNs
978-3-64-207793-7, 978-3-66-204978-5
Authors

Cristian S. Calude, Calude, Cristian S.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,944
of 132,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them