↓ Skip to main content

Cell

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: The Role of Multi-Parametric MRI and Fusion Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer – A Systematic Review of Current Literature
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Role of Multi-Parametric MRI and Fusion Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer – A Systematic Review of Current Literature
Chapter number 7
Book title
Cell & Molecular Biology of Prostate Cancer
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95693-0_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-995692-3, 978-3-31-995693-0
Authors

Debashis Sarkar, Sarkar, Debashis

Abstract

Introduction The use of mutiparametric MRI (MpMRI) guided fusion biopsy is becoming an increasingly popular investigation in an aid to increase diagnostic yield in those suspected of having prostate cancer (PCa). Before adopting this technology, it is necessary to confirm the accuracy, so that PCa can be reliably diagnosed with characterisation. Materials and Methods This chapter analysed the evidences, which varied from well-designed randomised controlled trials to case series to detect the accuracy of MpMRI compared with biopsy/ histology. Results MpMRI incorporating T2 and diffusion weighted imaging only detects tumours in around 92% cases. When dynamic contrast enhancement is added, cancer diagnosis is significantly improved. Fusion biopsy increases the detection of high-risk PCa by 32% over conventional biopsy alone. Conclusion This review also revealed that fusion biopsy did not increase cancer detection rate but combined biopsy (Systematic and fusion) provide the highest detection rate for the diagnosis of PCa.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Computer Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,510,637
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,230
of 4,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,861
of 341,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#20
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.