↓ Skip to main content

Multi-Drug Resistance in Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Multi-Drug Resistance in Cancer'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Multi-Drug Resistance in Cancer
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Multi-Drug Resistance in Cancer
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Studying Drug Resistance Using Genetically Engineered Mouse Models for Breast Cancer
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Mechanisms of multidrug resistance in cancer.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in single-step and multi-step drug-selected cancer cells.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Pharmacogenetics of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters and Clinical Implications
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Flow cytometric evaluation of multidrug resistance proteins.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Targeted chemotherapy in drug-resistant tumors, noninvasive imaging of P-glycoprotein-mediated functional transport in cancer, and emerging role of Pgp in neurodegenerative diseases.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Epigenetic Regulation of Multidrug Resistance 1 Gene Expression: Profiling CpG Methylation Status Using Bisulphite Sequencing
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Expression and Function of P-Glycoprotein in Normal Tissues: Effect on Pharmacokinetics
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Molecular Mechanism of ATP-Dependent Solute Transport by Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 1
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Impact of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein on Cancer Treatment Outcomes
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Drug Ratio-Dependent Antagonism: A New Category of Multidrug Resistance and Strategies for Its Circumvention
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Reversing Agents for ATP-Binding Cassette Drug Transporters
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Overcoming Multidrug Resistance in Cancer: Clinical Studies of P-Glycoprotein Inhibitors
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Implications of P-Glycoprotein Modulation
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Examination of CYP3A and P-Glycoprotein-Mediated Drug–Drug Interactions Using Animal Models
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Generating Inhibitors of P-Glycoprotein: Where to, Now?
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Immunosuppressors as Multidrug Resistance Reversal Agents
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Overcoming Multidrug Resistance by RNA Interference
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Circumventing Tumor Resistance to Chemotherapy by Nanotechnology
Attention for Chapter 21: Circumventing Tumor Resistance to Chemotherapy by Nanotechnology
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Circumventing Tumor Resistance to Chemotherapy by Nanotechnology
Chapter number 21
Book title
Multi-Drug Resistance in Cancer
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-416-6_21
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-415-9, 978-1-60761-416-6
Authors

Xing-Jie Liang, Chunying Chen, Yuliang Zhao, Paul C. Wang, Liang XJ, Chen C, Zhao Y, Wang PC, Liang, Xing-Jie, Chen, Chunying, Zhao, Yuliang, Wang, Paul C.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 17%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 44 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 14%
Chemistry 25 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 51 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,690,772
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,494
of 13,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,976
of 391,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#553
of 1,472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.