↓ Skip to main content

X-Chromosome Inactivation

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'X-Chromosome Inactivation'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Screening for Factors Involved in X Chromosome Inactivation Using Haploid ESCs
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Unbiased Genetic Screen to Identify Factors Involved in X-Chromosome Inactivation Using a Pooled Bar-Coded shRNA Library
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 ChIRP-MS: RNA-Directed Proteomic Discovery
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Manipulation of Xist Imprinting in Mouse Preimplantation Embryos
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Mice: Basic Protocol and Its Modification for Correcting X Chromosome Inactivation Status
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Live Imaging of Xist RNA
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Live Imaging of X-Chromosome Inactivation and Reactivation Kinetics
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Visualizing the Dynamics of Inactive X Chromosomes in Living Cells Using Antibody-Based Fluorescent Probes
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Visualization of Hidden Epitopes at the Inactive X Chromosome
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Chromosome Spread Analyses of Meiotic Sex Chromosome Inactivation
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Simultaneous RNA–DNA FISH in Mouse Preimplantation Embryos
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Combined Immunofluorescence, RNA FISH, and DNA FISH in Preimplantation Mouse Embryos
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 RNA-FISH and Immunofluorescence of Mouse Preimplantation and Postimplantation Embryos
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Experimental Analysis of Imprinted Mouse X-Chromosome Inactivation
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 X-Chromosome Inactivation and Escape from X Inactivation in Mouse
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Practical Analysis of Hi-C Data: Generating A/B Compartment Profiles
Attention for Chapter 8: Visualizing the Dynamics of Inactive X Chromosomes in Living Cells Using Antibody-Based Fluorescent Probes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Visualizing the Dynamics of Inactive X Chromosomes in Living Cells Using Antibody-Based Fluorescent Probes
Chapter number 8
Book title
X-Chromosome Inactivation
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8766-5_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8765-8, 978-1-4939-8766-5
Authors

Yuko Sato, Timothy J. Stasevich, Hiroshi Kimura, Sato, Yuko, Stasevich, Timothy J., Kimura, Hiroshi

Abstract

The inactive X chromosome (Xi) harbors characteristic epigenetic features, including the enrichment of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) and H4 lysine 20 monomethylation (H4K20me1) as well as a lack of histone acetylation. Recently, these modifications have been visualized not only in fixed specimen, but also in living cells via probes derived from modification-specific antibodies. The probes include fluorescently labeled antigen binding fragments (Fabs), which can be loaded into cells, as well as genetically encoded single-chain variable fragments tagged with the green fluorescent protein. We refer to the latter as modification specific intracellular antibodies, or "mintbodies" for short. By using Fabs or mintbodies to target Xi-specific modifications, the dynamics of Xi in living cells can be visualized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,535,454
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,494
of 13,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,054
of 337,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#17
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.