↓ Skip to main content

Preface.

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 192: Ecology and Physiology of the Intestinal Tract.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Ecology and Physiology of the Intestinal Tract.
Chapter number 192
Book title
Between Pathogenicity and Commensalism
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/82_2011_192
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-236559-1, 978-3-64-236560-7
Authors

Michael Blaut, Blaut, Michael

Abstract

The number of microorganisms inhabiting the human digestive tract exceeds the number of body cells by a factor of ten. This microbial community affects host physiology and host health. The metabolic potential of the gut microbiota is immense affording the extraction of energy from otherwise indigestible carbohydrates (dietary fiber) and the conversion of host-derived substances, non-nutritive dietary components and drugs. Recognized functions of the gut microbiota include provision of colonization resistance against pathogens and priming of both the innate and the acquired immune systems. However, the intestinal microbiota may also contribute to the development of diseases such as ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer. Culture-dependent studies provided basic knowledge on the gut microbiota, but only the advent of culture-independent molecular methods led to a better understanding of host-microbe interactions. The application of metagenomics to the gut microbial ecosystem revealed truly remarkable correlations between certain diseases and the gut microbiome. It also led to the suggestion of the existence of a 'core microbiome' that encompasses key functions shared by each individual. However, the mechanisms underlying host-microbe interactions have not yet been unraveled.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 28 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Environmental Science 8 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 36 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2011.
All research outputs
#20,152,153
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#598
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,318
of 240,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.