You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Risk to pollinators from the use of chlorpyrifos in the United States.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Ecological Risk Assessment for Chlorpyrifos in Terrestrial and Aquatic Systems in the United States
|
| Published in |
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-03865-0_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-903864-3, 978-3-31-903865-0
|
| Authors |
Cutler GC, Purdy J, Giesy JP, Solomon KR, G. Christopher Cutler, John Purdy, John P. Giesy, Keith R. Solomon, Cutler, G. Christopher, Purdy, John, Giesy, John P., Solomon, Keith R. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,749,823
of 26,486,749 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#23
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,640
of 323,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,486,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.