↓ Skip to main content

Statistical Analysis in Proteomics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Statistical Analysis in Proteomics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction to Proteomics Technologies.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Topics in Study Design and Analysis for Multistage Clinical Proteomics Studies
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Preprocessing and Analysis of LC-MS-Based Proteomic Data.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Statistical Analysis in Proteomics
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Phenylimidazole-based homoleptic iridium(III) compounds for blue phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes with high efficiency and long lifetime
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Visualization and Differential Analysis of Protein Expression Data Using R.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 False Discovery Rate Estimation in Proteomics.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A Nonparametric Bayesian Model for Nested Clustering
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Set-Based Test Procedures for the Functional Analysis of Protein Lists from Differential Analysis.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Classification of Samples with Order-Restricted Discriminant Rules.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Application of Discriminant Analysis and Cross-Validation on Proteomics Data.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Protein Sequence Analysis by Proximities
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Statistical Method for Integrative Platform Analysis: Application to Integration of Proteomic and Microarray Data.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Data Fusion in Metabolomics and Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Reconstruction of Protein Networks Using Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Detection of Unknown Amino Acid Substitutions Using Error-Tolerant Database Search
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Data Analysis Strategies for Protein Modification Identification.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Dissecting the iTRAQ Data Analysis.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Statistical Aspects in Proteomic Biomarker Discovery.
Attention for Chapter 7: False Discovery Rate Estimation in Proteomics.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
False Discovery Rate Estimation in Proteomics.
Chapter number 7
Book title
Statistical Analysis in Proteomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3106-4_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3105-7, 978-1-4939-3106-4
Authors

Aggarwal, Suruchi, Yadav, Amit Kumar, Suruchi Aggarwal, Amit Kumar Yadav Ph.D., Amit Kumar Yadav

Abstract

With the advancement in proteomics separation techniques and improvements in mass analyzers, the data generated in a mass-spectrometry based proteomics experiment is rising exponentially. Such voluminous datasets necessitate automated computational tools for high-throughput data analysis and appropriate statistical control. The data is searched using one or more of the several popular database search algorithms. The matches assigned by these tools can have false positives and statistical validation of these false matches is necessary before making any biological interpretations. Without such procedures, the biological inferences do not hold true and may be outright misleading. There is a considerable overlap between true and false positives. To control the false positives amongst a set of accepted matches, there is a need for some statistical estimate that can reflect the amount of false positives present in the data processed. False discovery rate (FDR) is the metric for global confidence assessment of a large-scale proteomics dataset. This chapter covers the basics of FDR, its application in proteomics, and methods to estimate FDR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 24%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 31 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Chemistry 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,827,682
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,696
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,887
of 393,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#469
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.