↓ Skip to main content

Microarray Data Analysis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Microarray Data Analysis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 236 Bioinformatics and Microarray Data Analysis on the Cloud.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 237 MetaMirClust: Discovery and Exploration of Evolutionarily Conserved miRNA Clusters.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 238 Methods and Techniques for miRNA Data Analysis.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 239 Normalization of Affymetrix miRNA Microarrays for the Analysis of Cancer Samples.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 240 Classification and Clustering on Microarray Data for Gene Functional Prediction Using R
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 241 Using Semantic Similarities and csbl.go for Analyzing Microarray Data
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 242 Integrated Analysis of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Datasets Reveals Information on Protein Expressivity and Factors Affecting Translational Efficiency
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 245 Microarray Analysis in Glioblastomas
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 246 Querying Co-regulated Genes on Diverse Gene Expression Datasets Via Biclustering
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 247 Analysis of microRNA Microarrays in Cardiogenesis.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 248 A Protocol to Collect Specific Mouse Skeletal Muscles for Metabolomics Studies
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 249 Ontology-Based Analysis of Microarray Data
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 250 Functional Analysis of microRNA in Multiple Myeloma.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 252 Integrating Microarray Data and GRNs.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 256 Erratum to: Classification and Clustering on Microarray Data for Gene Functional Prediction Using R
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 280 Analysis of Gene Expression Patterns Using Biclustering
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 284 Biological Network Inference from Microarray Data, Current Solutions, and Assessments.
Attention for Chapter 284: Biological Network Inference from Microarray Data, Current Solutions, and Assessments.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Biological Network Inference from Microarray Data, Current Solutions, and Assessments.
Chapter number 284
Book title
Microarray Data Analysis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/7651_2015_284
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3172-9, 978-1-4939-3173-6
Authors

Roy, Swarup, Guzzi, Pietro Hiram, Swarup Roy, Pietro Hiram Guzzi

Abstract

Currently in bioinformatics and systems biology there is a growing interest for the analysis of associations among biological molecules at a network level. A main research in this area is represented by the inference of biological networks from experimental data. Biological network inference aims to reconstruct network of interactions (or associations) among biological molecules (e.g., genes or proteins) starting from experimental observations. The current scenario is characterized by a growing number of algorithms for the inference, while few attention has been posed on the determination of fair assessments and comparisons. Current assessments are usually based on the comparison of the algorithms using reference networks or gold standard datasets. Here we survey some selected inference algorithms and we compare current assessments. We also present a systematic listing of freely available inference and assessment tools for easy reference. Finally we outline some possible future directions of research, such as the use of a prior knowledge into the assessment process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2015.
All research outputs
#13,958,483
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,932
of 13,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,590
of 284,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.