You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Genetic manipulation of poxviruses using bacterial artificial chromosome recombineering.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 3 |
Book title |
Vaccinia Virus and Poxvirology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-876-4_3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-875-7, 978-1-61779-876-4
|
Authors |
Cottingham MG, Matthew G. Cottingham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 45% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#12,936,730
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,290
of 13,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,348
of 244,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#232
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.