↓ Skip to main content

Epstein Barr Virus Volume 1

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: The Epigenetic Life Cycle of Epstein-Barr Virus.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Epigenetic Life Cycle of Epstein-Barr Virus.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Epstein Barr Virus Volume 1
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22822-8_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922821-1, 978-3-31-922822-8
Authors

Hammerschmidt, Wolfgang, Wolfgang Hammerschmidt

Abstract

Ever since the discovery of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) more than 50 years ago, this virus has been studied for its capacity to readily establish a latent infection, which is the prominent hallmark of this member of the herpesvirus family. EBV has become an important model for many aspects of herpesviral latency, but the molecular steps and mechanisms that lead to and promote viral latency have only emerged recently. It now appears that the virus exploits diverse facets of epigenetic gene regulation in the cellular host to establish a latent infection. Most viral genes are transcriptionally repressed, and viral chromatin is densely compacted during EBV's latent phase, but latent infection is not a dead end. In order to escape from this phase, epigenetic silencing must be reverted efficiently and quickly. It appears that EBV has perfected a clever strategy to overcome transcriptional repression of its many lytic genes to initiate virus de novo synthesis within a few hours after induction of its lytic cycle. This review tries to summarize the known molecular mechanisms, the current models, concepts, and ideas underlying this viral strategy. This review also attempts to identify and address gaps in our current understanding of EBV's epigenetic mechanisms within the infected cellular host.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2015.
All research outputs
#18,428,159
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#525
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,898
of 353,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#31
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.