↓ Skip to main content

C. elegans

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Fundamentals of Comparative Genome Analysis in Caenorhabditis Nematodes.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Fundamentals of Comparative Genome Analysis in Caenorhabditis Nematodes.
Chapter number 2
Book title
C. elegans
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2842-2_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-2841-5, 978-1-4939-2842-2
Authors

Haag, Eric S, Thomas, Cristel G, Eric S. Haag, Cristel G. Thomas

Abstract

The genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans was the first of any animal to be sequenced completely, and it remains the "gold standard" for completeness and annotations. Even before the C. elegans genome was completed, however, biologists began examining the generality of its features in the genomes of other Caenorhabditis species. With many such genomes now sequenced and available via WormBase, C. elegans researchers are often confronted with how to interpret comparative genomic data. In this article, we present practical approaches to addressing several common issues, including possible sources of error in homology annotations, the often complex relationships between sequence similarity, orthology, paralogy, and gene family evolution, the impact of sexual mode on genome assemblies and content, and the determination and use of synteny as a tool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,239,245
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,190
of 13,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,793
of 353,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#271
of 997 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 997 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.