↓ Skip to main content

Shape matters: assessing regional variation of Bell Beaker projectile points in Central Europe using geometric morphometrics

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shape matters: assessing regional variation of Bell Beaker projectile points in Central Europe using geometric morphometrics
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12520-016-0423-z
Authors

J. Petřík, D. Sosna, L. Prokeš, D. Štefanisko, P. Galeta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 7 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Social Sciences 3 16%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,137,209
of 13,304,005 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#162
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,066
of 268,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,304,005 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.