↓ Skip to main content

Endocannabinoids

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Distribution of the Endocannabinoid System in the Central Nervous System.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Distribution of the Endocannabinoid System in the Central Nervous System.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Endocannabinoids
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20825-1_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-920824-4, 978-3-31-920825-1
Authors

Hu, Sherry Shu-Jung, Mackie, Ken, Sherry Shu-Jung Hu, Ken Mackie

Editors

Roger G. Pertwee

Abstract

The endocannabinoid system consists of endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids), the enzymes that synthesize and degrade endocannabinoids, and the receptors that transduce the effects of endocannabinoids. Much of what we know about the function of endocannabinoids comes from studies that combine localization of endocannabinoid system components with physiological or behavioral approaches. This review will focus on the localization of the best-known components of the endocannabinoid system for which the strongest anatomical evidence exists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 209 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 39 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 7%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 53 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,156,168
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#214
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,648
of 353,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#29
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.