↓ Skip to main content

The role of codified sources of knowledge in innovation: Empirical evidence from Dutch manufacturing

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evolutionary Economics, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of codified sources of knowledge in innovation: Empirical evidence from Dutch manufacturing
Published in
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00191-005-0244-1
Authors

Stefano Brusoni, Orietta Marsili, Ammon Salter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 60 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 16%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 28 42%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 16 24%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2013.
All research outputs
#7,573,552
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#107
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,097
of 60,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Economics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.