↓ Skip to main content

Biogas Science and Technology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 4: Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Anaerobic Digestion: A Review.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 224)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Anaerobic Digestion: A Review.
Chapter number 4
Book title
Biogas Science and Technology
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21993-6_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-921992-9, 978-3-31-921993-6
Authors

Dubé, Charles-David, Guiot, Serge R, Charles-David Dubé, Serge R. Guiot, Guiot, Serge R.

Abstract

Direct interspecies electrons transfer (DIET) is a syntrophic metabolism in which free electrons flow from one cell to another without being shuttled by reduced molecules such as molecular hydrogen or formate. As more and more microorganisms show a capacity for electron exchange, either to export or import them, it becomes obvious that DIET is a syntrophic metabolism that is much more present in nature than previously thought. This article reviews literature related to DIET, specifically in reference to anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic granular sludge, a biofilm, is a specialized microenvironment where syntrophic bacterial and archaeal organisms grow together in close proximity. Exoelectrogenic bacteria degrading organic substrates or intermediates need an electron sink and electrotrophic methanogens represent perfect partners to assimilate those electrons and produce methane. The granule extracellular polymeric substances by making the biofilm matrix more conductive, play a role as electrons carrier in DIET.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 26%
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 6 4%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 35 23%
Engineering 20 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Chemical Engineering 9 6%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 52 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,441,700
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#50
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,072
of 356,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.