↓ Skip to main content

Handbook of ELISPOT

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Handbook of ELISPOT'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Challenges in Developing Protein Secretion Assays at a Single-Cell Level
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Mastering the Computational Challenges of Elispot Plate Evaluation
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Essential Controls for ELISpot Assay
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Automatic Search of Spots and Color Classification in ELISPOT Assay
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Four Color ImmunoSpot ® Assays for Identification of Effector T-Cell Lineages
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Detection of Cross-Reactive B Cells Using the FluoroSpot Assay
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Multiplex ImmunoSpot® Assays for the Study of Functional B Cell Subpopulations
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Detecting all Immunoglobulin Classes and Subclasses in a Multiplex 7 Color ImmunoSpot® Assay
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Multiplexing T- and B-Cell FLUOROSPOT Assays: Experimental Validation of the Multi-Color ImmunoSpot ® Software Based on Center of Mass Distance Algorithm
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Multi-Color FLUOROSPOT Counting Using ImmunoSpot ® Fluoro-X™ Suite
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 B-Cell ELISpot Assay to Quantify Antigen-Specific Antibody-Secreting Cells in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Identification of Novel Mycobacterial Targets for Murine CD4 + T-Cells by IFNγ ELISPOT
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 ELISPOT-Based “Multi-Color FluoroSpot” to Study Type-Specific and Cross-Reactive Responses in Memory B Cells after Dengue and Zika Virus Infections
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Cultured ELISpot Assay to Investigate Dengue Virus Specific T-Cell Responses
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Ex Vivo ELISpot Assay to Investigate Dengue Virus Specific T-Cell Responses
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Ex Vivo ELISpot Assay to Investigate iNKT Cell Responses in Acute Dengue Infection
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Dendritic Cell-Based ELISpot Assay for Assessing T-Cell IFN-γ Responses in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells to Dengue Envelope Proteins
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Utilization of Feline ELISpot to Evaluate the Immunogenicity of a T Cell-Based FIV MAP Vaccine
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Detection and Quantification of Influenza A/H1N1 Virus-Specific Memory B Cells in Human PBMCs Using ELISpot Assay
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Towards a Full Automation of the ELISpot Assay for Safe and Parallelized Immunomonitoring
Attention for Chapter 12: Identification of Novel Mycobacterial Targets for Murine CD4 + T-Cells by IFNγ ELISPOT
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Identification of Novel Mycobacterial Targets for Murine CD4 + T-Cells by IFNγ ELISPOT
Chapter number 12
Book title
Handbook of ELISPOT
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8567-8_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8566-1, 978-1-4939-8567-8
Authors

Alison J. Johnson, Steven C. Kennedy, Tony W. Ng, Steven A. Porcelli, Johnson, Alison J., Kennedy, Steven C., Ng, Tony W., Porcelli, Steven A.

Abstract

Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) is an assay used to detect secretion of cytokines from immune cells. The resolution and sensitivity of ELISPOT allow for the detection of rare T cell specificities and small quantities of molecules produced by individual cells. In this chapter, we describe an epitope screening method that uses CD4+ T cell ELISPOT assays to identify specific novel mycobacterial antigens as potential vaccine candidates. In order to screen a large number of candidate epitopes simultaneously, pools of predicted MHC class II peptides were used to identify mycobacterial specific CD4+ T cells. Using this method, we identified novel mycobacterial antigens as vaccine candidates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Computer Science 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,525,274
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,976
of 13,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,496
of 442,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,194
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.