Chapter title |
Dendritic Cell-Based ELISpot Assay for Assessing T-Cell IFN-γ Responses in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells to Dengue Envelope Proteins
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 17 |
Book title |
Handbook of ELISPOT
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-8567-8_17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-8566-1, 978-1-4939-8567-8
|
Authors |
Peifang Sun, Monika Simmons, Sun, Peifang, Simmons, Monika |
Abstract |
Dengue envelope (E) protein is a dominant antigen for vaccine development and E-based vaccines have shown partial or full protection against live-virus challenge in non-human primates. Generally, T cell responses can be investigated with peptides. However, hundreds of over-lapping peptides need to be synthesized to cover the whole sequence of a protein, which brings the cost up to a much higher level than purchasing a protein. We have developed an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay that uses intact E proteins instead of peptides for assessing IFN-gamma (IFN-γ) responses. The assay relies on professional antigen presenting cells, dendritic cells, to process and present the E proteins to stimulate T cells.Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from dengue-exposed and naïve subjects were selected for the assay development. IFN-γ production ranged from 53 to 513 spot forming units (SFUs) and 0-45 SFUs per million PBMCs in dengue-exposed and naive subject groups, respectively. The assay allowed quantification of E-specific IFN-γ secreting memory T cells in subjects 9 years after exposure to a live-attenuated virus vaccine and live-virus challenge. Our results suggest that the dendritic cell-based IFN-γ assay is a useful tool for assessing immunological memory for clinical research. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |