↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Preparation of a Well-Defined and Stable β-Barrel Pore-Forming Aβ42 Oligomer
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Preparation of a Well-Defined and Stable β-Barrel Pore-Forming Aβ42 Oligomer
Book title
Amyloid Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7816-8_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7815-1, 978-1-4939-7816-8
Authors

Montserrat Serra-Batiste, Martí Ninot-Pedrosa, Eduard Puig, Sonia Ciudad, Margarida Gairí, Natàlia Carulla

Abstract

The formation of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) oligomers at the cellular membrane is considered a crucial process that underlies neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease (AD). To obtain structural information on this type of oligomers, we were inspired by membrane protein approaches used to stabilize, characterize, and analyze the function of such proteins. Using these approaches, we developed conditions under which Aβ42, the Aβ variant most strongly linked to the aetiology of AD, assembles into an oligomer that inserts into lipid bilayers as a well-defined pore and adopts a specific structure with characteristics of a β-barrel arrangement. We named this oligomer β-barrel Pore-Forming Aβ42 Oligomer (βPFOAβ42). Here, we describe detailed protocols for its preparation and characterization. We expect βPFOAβ42 to be useful in establishing the involvement of membrane-associated Aβ oligomers in AD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Other 4 40%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,240,790
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,141
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,900
of 442,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#95
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.