↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 27: Tau Assembly into Filaments
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Tau Assembly into Filaments
Chapter number 27
Book title
Amyloid Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7816-8_27
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7815-1, 978-1-4939-7816-8
Authors

Mar Pérez, Raquel Cuadros, Miguel Medina, Pérez, Mar, Cuadros, Raquel, Medina, Miguel

Abstract

The brain-specific tau protein binds directly through microtubules to regulate dynamically its structure and function. It also plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of a number of neurodegenerative disorders collectively known as tauopathies, the most common of which is Alzheimer's disease (AD). Under pathological conditions, the natively unfolded tau protein self-assembles into filamentous structures of aggregated, hyperphosphorylated tau. In AD brains, tau accumulates in the neuronal perikarya and processes as paired helical filaments (PHF) forming the neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) characteristic of the disease. Prominent tau neurofibrillary pathology is a common feature in all tauopathies and its development is associated with progressive neuronal loss and cognitive decline. A precise understanding of the cellular, biochemical, and structural mechanisms involved in the process of tau protein aggregation and fibril formation is key to design strategies to prevent, slow down, or stop the neurodegenerative pathway leading to neuronal loss in AD and other tauopathies. Herein, we describe some complementary experimental procedures for PHF purification from human postmortem brain, tau expression and purification, as well as in vitro formation of tau filaments from purified recombinant tau.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 57%
Neuroscience 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,987
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,849
of 442,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.