↓ Skip to main content

Teratogenicity Testing

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Teratogenicity Testing'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 An Overview of Teratology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Teratology Study Guidelines: An Overview
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Biological Concerns on the Selection of Animal Models for Teratogenic Testing
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 The Validated Embryonic Stem Cell Test with Murine Embryonic Stem Cells
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Assess Developmental Toxicity in the Osteogenic Lineage
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Chick Embryonic Cardiomyocyte Micromass System for Assessing Developmental Cardiotoxicity of Drugs
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Flow Cytometry to Evaluate Potential Developmental Toxicants in the Embryonic Stem Cell
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Morphology-Based Whole Embryo Culture for Developmental Toxicity of Drugs
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Western Blot Methodologies for Analysis of In Vitro Protein Expression Induced by Teratogenic Agents
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Manipulation of MicroRNAs in Cultured Mouse Embryos: Applications for Developmental Toxicology
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Insights into the Phenotypic and Behavioral Effects of Teratogenic Drugs in Caenorhabditis elegans
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Effect of Teratogens on Development of Drosophila melanogaster
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Cellular Responses in Drosophila melanogaster Following Teratogen Exposure
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Behavioral Teratogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Evaluation of Teratogenicity of Pharmaceuticals Using FETAX
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Histological Observation of Teratogenic Phenotypes Induced in Frog Embryo Assays
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Visualization of Gene Expression Patterns by In Situ Hybridization on Early Stages of Development of Xenopus laevis
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Analysis of Lethality and Malformations During Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Development
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 General Whole-Mount Immunohistochemistry of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Embryos and Larvae Protocol
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Geometric Morphometrics as a Tool to Evaluate Teratogenic Effects in Zebrafish (Danio rerio)
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Live Metabolic Profile Analysis of Zebrafish Embryos Using a Seahorse XF 24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Behavioral Profiling of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Larvae Following Teratogen Exposure
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Omics in Zebrafish Teratogenesis
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Proteomic Analysis of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) After Chemical Exposure
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Immunohistochemical Assessment as a Tool for Investigating Developmental Toxicity in Zebrafish (Danio rerio)
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Oxidative Stress Assessment in Zebrafish Larvae
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Hemodynamic Studies for Analyzing the Teratogenic Effects of Drugs in the Zebrafish Embryo
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Western Blot Analysis and Immunostaining for Prediction of Embryotoxicity in Mus musculus
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Histological and Histochemical Profile for Teratological Assessment in Mus musculus
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 In Vivo Analysis of Apoptosis in Embryonic Hippocampus
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Measurement of Mitochondrial Toxicity Parameters in Embryonic Hippocampus
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Animal Tests for Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment in Neonatal Mouse
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 Methodology of Genotoxic and Teratogenic Studies in Rats
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 Whole Mount In Situ Hybridization and Morphometric Analysis in Rabbit Embryos
Attention for Chapter 3: Biological Concerns on the Selection of Animal Models for Teratogenic Testing
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Biological Concerns on the Selection of Animal Models for Teratogenic Testing
Chapter number 3
Book title
Teratogenicity Testing
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7883-0_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7882-3, 978-1-4939-7883-0
Authors

Sofia Alves-Pimenta, Bruno Colaço, Paula A. Oliveira, Carlos Venâncio, Alves-Pimenta, Sofia, Colaço, Bruno, Oliveira, Paula A., Venâncio, Carlos

Abstract

During pregnancy fetus can be exposed to a variety of chemicals which may induce abortion and malformations. Due to the amounts of new substances coming into the market every year, a high demand for a rapid, reliable, and cost-effective method to detect potential toxicity is necessary. Different species have been used as animal models for teratogen screening, most of them sharing similar development processes with humans. However, the application of embryology knowledge to teratology is hampered by the complexity of the reproduction processes.The present chapter outlines the essential development periods in different models, and highlights the similarities and differences between species, advantages and disadvantages of each group, and specific sensitivities for teratogenic tests. These models can be organized into the following categories: (1) invertebrate species such Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, which have become ideal for screening simple mechanisms in the early periods of reproductive cycle, allowing for rapid results and minor ethical concerns; (2) vertebrate nonmammalian species such Xenopus laevis and Danio rerio, important models to assess teratogenic potential in later development with fewer ethical requirements; and (3) the mammalian species Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Oryctolagus cuniculus, phylogenetically more close to humans, essential to assess complex specialized processes, that occur later in development.Rules for development toxicology tests require the use of mammalian species. However, ethical concerns and costs limit their use in large-scale screening. By contrast, invertebrate and vertebrate nonmammalian species are increasing as alternative animal models, as these organisms combine less ethical requirements, low costs and culture conditions compatible with large-scale screening. In contrast to the in vitro techniques, their main advantage is to allow for high-throughput screening in a whole-animal context, not dependent on the prior identification of a target. In this chapter, the biological development of the animals most used in teratogenic tests is adressed with the aims of maximizing human translation, reducing the number of animals used, and the time to market for new drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,718,998
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,374
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,612
of 444,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#432
of 1,483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.