↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Purification and Characterization of Low-n Tau Oligomers
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Purification and Characterization of Low-n Tau Oligomers
Book title
Amyloid Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7816-8_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7815-1, 978-1-4939-7816-8
Authors

Senthilvelrajan Kaniyappan, Ram Reddy Chandupatla, Eckhard Mandelkow

Abstract

Deposition of Tau aggregates in patient's brains is a hallmark of several neurodegenerative diseases collectively called Tauopathies. One of the most studied Tauopathies is Alzheimer disease (AD) in which Tau protein aggregates into filaments and coalesces into neurofibrillary tangles. The distribution of Tau filaments is a reliable indicator of the clinical stages of AD (Braak stages), but intermediate oligomeric assemblies of Tau are considered to be more directly toxic to neurons than late stage filaments. Studying the elusive role of Tau oligomers has been difficult because of their dynamic nature and paucity of methods to purify them in vitro. In this chapter, we describe methods to purify Tau oligomers to near homogeneity and to characterize them by hydrophobic interaction chromatography and biophysical methods such as fluorescence spectrophotometry, dynamic light scattering, atomic force microscopy, and others. Functional characterization includes the assessment of synapses and toxicity assays which show that oligomers can damage synapses locally but show little toxicity to neurons globally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Librarian 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 33%
Neuroscience 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,987
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,849
of 442,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.