Article
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Light-Induced Electron Transfer Protocol for Enzymatic Oxidation of Polysaccharides
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Cellulases
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7877-9_17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7876-2, 978-1-4939-7877-9
|
| Authors |
David Cannella |
| Abstract |
Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) are redox enzymes that oxidize the most recalcitrant polysaccharides and require extracellular electron donors. The role of electron donation to redox enzymes is pivotal since a nonefficient electron transfer might result in partial activity or reduced kinetics. In this protocol we show the effect of using excited photosynthetic pigments combined with reducing agents as efficient electron donors for monooxygenases. The light-induced electron transfer can enhance the oxidation ability of LPMOs up to ten times. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 286 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Unknown | 100 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 65 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 114 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,416,163
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,239
of 13,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,826
of 442,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#432
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.