↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease — State of the Art

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Clinical efficacy of budipine in Parkinson's disease.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Clinical efficacy of budipine in Parkinson's disease.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease — State of the Art
Published in
Journal of neural transmission Supplementum, January 1999
DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-6360-3_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-21-183275-2, 978-3-70-916360-3
Authors

Professor Dr. H. Przuntek, T. Müller, H. Przuntek, Przuntek, H., Müller, T.

Abstract

The lipophilic t-butyl analog of 1-alkyl-4,4-diphenyl piperidine, budipine, possesses a polyvalent spectrum of mechanisms of action. Budipine experimentally increased the brain content of norepinephrine, serotonine, dopamine and histamine in reserpine treated rats. Budipine did not alter the receptor affinity of these neurotransmitters but antagonizes the effect of NMDA at its receptor binding site in vitro. Budipine reduced MPP+ toxicity in the nigrostriatal system of mice. This complex pharmacologic profile is not comparable to the one of convenient antiparkinsonian drugs. In clinical trials budipine reduced tremor, akinesia and rigidity. Budipine induced a relevant additional positive effect in patients with an optimal dopaminergic therapy based on levodopa and dopamine agonists, such as bromocriptine. Current available data suggest that the need for levodopa application in early stages of the disease may be postponed by budipine and that the long-term application of budipine may induce a levodopa-sparing effect.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 29%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,463,244
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neural transmission Supplementum
#21
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,763
of 99,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neural transmission Supplementum
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them