You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
The Stellar IMF of Galactic Clusters and Its Evolution
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 11 |
Book title |
The Initial Mass Function 50 Years Later
|
Published in |
arXiv, January 2005
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4020-3407-7_11 |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4020-3406-0, 978-1-4020-3407-7
|
Authors |
Guido De Marchi, Francesco Paresce, Simon Portegies Zwart, De Marchi, Guido, Paresce, Francesco, Zwart, Simon Portegies |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 60% |
Professor | 2 | 40% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 120% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2013.
All research outputs
#12,930,522
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#195,147
of 937,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,278
of 139,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#151
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 937,141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.