You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Preparation of urinary exosomes: methodological issues for clinical proteomics.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 3 |
| Book title |
Clinical Proteomics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1872-0_3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1871-3, 978-1-4939-1872-0
|
| Authors |
Pitto M, Corbetta S, Raimondo F, Marina Pitto, Samuele Corbetta, Francesca Raimondo, Pitto, Marina, Corbetta, Samuele, Raimondo, Francesca |
| Editors |
Antonia Vlahou, Manousos Makridakis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 30% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,418,694
of 22,816,807 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,914
of 13,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,010
of 258,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#64
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,816,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.