You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
A Rapid and General Assay for Monitoring Endogenous Gene Modification
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 15 |
| Book title |
Engineered Zinc Finger Proteins
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60761-753-2_15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-60761-752-5, 978-1-60761-753-2
|
| Authors |
Dmitry Y. Guschin, Adam J. Waite, George E. Katibah, Jeffrey C. Miller, Michael C. Holmes, Edward J. Rebar, Guschin, Dmitry Y., Waite, Adam J., Katibah, George E., Miller, Jeffrey C., Holmes, Michael C., Rebar, Edward J. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 427 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 20% |
| Researcher | 85 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 59 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 153 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 139 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,381,483
of 23,539,593 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#417
of 13,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,866
of 166,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#9
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,539,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.