You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
ORFeome Cloning
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Reverse Chemical Genetics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-60761-232-2_1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-60761-231-5, 978-1-60761-232-2
|
| Authors |
Osamu Ohara, Ohara, Osamu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 27% |
| Professor | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 45% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,557,888
of 23,054,359 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,346
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,205
of 170,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#61
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,054,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.