You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Carrion crows learn to discriminate between calls of reliable and unreliable conspecifics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Animal Cognition, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10071-015-0879-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudia A. F. Wascher, Friederike Hillemann, Daniela Canestrari, Vittorio Baglione |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 20% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 10% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 7 | 70% |
Members of the public | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 18% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 44% |
Psychology | 9 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,294,906
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#603
of 1,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,198
of 278,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.