↓ Skip to main content

Partial integer decorrelation: optimum trade-off between variance reduction and bias amplification

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geodesy, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 144)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Partial integer decorrelation: optimum trade-off between variance reduction and bias amplification
Published in
Journal of Geodesy, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00190-009-0343-0
Authors

Patrick Henkel, Christoph Günther

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 25%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,550,341
of 12,354,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geodesy
#32
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,945
of 269,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geodesy
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,354,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them