You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Erratum to: Imaging of Microglial Activation in Alzheimer’s Disease by [11C]PBR28 PET
|
---|---|
Book title |
Methods in Molecular Biology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7704-8_26 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7703-1, 978-1-4939-7704-8
|
Authors |
Donat, Cornelius K., Mirzaei, Nazanin, Tang, Sac-Pham, Edison, Paul, Sastre, Magdalena, Cornelius K. Donat, Nazanin Mirzaei, Sac-Pham Tang, Paul Edison, Magdalena Sastre |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 2 | 67% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,230,289
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,137
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,015
of 326,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.