You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Sendai Virus for Cancer Immunotherapy
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 21 |
Book title |
Viral Applications of Green Fluorescent Protein
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-59745-559-6_21 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-934115-87-9, 978-1-59745-559-6
|
Authors |
Yasuji Ueda, Mamoru Hasegawa, Yoshikazu Yonemitsu, Ueda, Yasuji, Hasegawa, Mamoru, Yonemitsu, Yoshikazu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 50% |
Professor | 1 | 25% |
Student > Master | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 75% |
Computer Science | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,652,891
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,380
of 13,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,525
of 171,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#62
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.