You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Dental Pulp Stem Cell (DPSC) Isolation, Characterization, and Differentiation.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Stem Cells and Tissue Repair
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1435-7_8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1434-0, 978-1-4939-1435-7
|
| Authors |
Ferro F, Spelat R, Baheney CS, Federico Ferro, Renza Spelat, Chelsea S. Baheney, Ferro, Federico, Spelat, Renza, Baheney, Chelsea S. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,226,014
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,181
of 13,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,813
of 305,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#167
of 597 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 597 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.