↓ Skip to main content

Microarray Data Analysis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Microarray Data Analysis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 236 Bioinformatics and Microarray Data Analysis on the Cloud.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 237 MetaMirClust: Discovery and Exploration of Evolutionarily Conserved miRNA Clusters.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 238 Methods and Techniques for miRNA Data Analysis.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 239 Normalization of Affymetrix miRNA Microarrays for the Analysis of Cancer Samples.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 240 Classification and Clustering on Microarray Data for Gene Functional Prediction Using R
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 241 Using Semantic Similarities and csbl.go for Analyzing Microarray Data
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 242 Integrated Analysis of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Datasets Reveals Information on Protein Expressivity and Factors Affecting Translational Efficiency
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 245 Microarray Analysis in Glioblastomas
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 246 Querying Co-regulated Genes on Diverse Gene Expression Datasets Via Biclustering
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 247 Analysis of microRNA Microarrays in Cardiogenesis.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 248 A Protocol to Collect Specific Mouse Skeletal Muscles for Metabolomics Studies
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 249 Ontology-Based Analysis of Microarray Data
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 250 Functional Analysis of microRNA in Multiple Myeloma.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 252 Integrating Microarray Data and GRNs.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 256 Erratum to: Classification and Clustering on Microarray Data for Gene Functional Prediction Using R
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 280 Analysis of Gene Expression Patterns Using Biclustering
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 284 Biological Network Inference from Microarray Data, Current Solutions, and Assessments.
Attention for Chapter 237: MetaMirClust: Discovery and Exploration of Evolutionarily Conserved miRNA Clusters.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
MetaMirClust: Discovery and Exploration of Evolutionarily Conserved miRNA Clusters.
Chapter number 237
Book title
Microarray Data Analysis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/7651_2015_237
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3172-9, 978-1-4939-3173-6
Authors

Chan, Wen-Ching, Lin, Wen-Chang, Wen-Ching Chan, Wen-chang Lin, Lin, Wen-chang

Abstract

Recent emerging studies suggest that a substantial fraction of microRNA (miRNA) genes is likely to form clusters in terms of evolutionary conservation and biological implications, posing a significant challenge for the research community and shifting the bottleneck of scientific discovery from miRNA singletons to miRNA clusters. In addition, the advance in molecular sequencing technique such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) has facilitated researchers to comprehensively characterize miRNAs with low abundance on genome-wide scale in multiple species. Taken together, a large scale, cross-species survey of grouped miRNAs based on genomic location would be valuable for investigating their biological functions and regulations in an evolutionary perspective. In the present chapter, we describe the application of effective and efficient bioinformatics tools on the identification of clustered miRNAs and illustrate how to use the recently developed Web-based database, MetaMirClust ( http://fgfr.ibms.sinic.aedu.tw/MetaMirClust ) to discover evolutionarily conserved pattern of miRNA clusters across metazoans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 35%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2015.
All research outputs
#17,758,492
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,224
of 13,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,653
of 264,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.