You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Methods for Studying Functional Interactions Among Neuronal Populations
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Dynamic Brain Imaging
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-59745-543-5_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-934115-74-9, 978-1-59745-543-5
|
| Authors |
Nandakumar S. Narayanan, Mark Laubach, Narayanan, Nandakumar S., Laubach, Mark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 28 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,149,512
of 24,657,405 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,602
of 13,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,090
of 179,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#130
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,657,405 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,872 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.